The Left has established an argument that ISIS cannot sneak into the country through the Syrian refugees because of the strict vetting process of the Obama administration.
Though that argument has been ripped to shreds in the theoretical world after the testimony of FBI Director, James Comey, it can now also be proven to be a false theory due to physical evidence.
In Louisville, KY, two refugees were stopped by the FBI, only after they had arrived in the US and planned their attacks. They had already slipped through the screening process to enter the country despite Barack Obama’s assurances that each and every one of the 10,000 Syrian refugees would be vetted for Terrorist ties.
Waad Ramadan Alwan and Mohanad Shareef Hammadi were both charged with plotting to launch attacks inside the United States. They had plotted to send sniper rifles, stinger missiles, and money to al-Qaida members that were waging a war against American troops over sees.
Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, has since insisted that the Obama Administration is fully capable of vetting each and every one of the 10,000 Syrian refugees, though after being confronted with the fact that Syria is a mess and there was no database with which to compare the incoming refugees to, Lynch explained that the Syrian refugees would be screened through the process of interviews and biometric screenings.
In other words, we are going to ask the incoming Syrian refugees whether or not they are terrorists as well as give them a health exam that will check them for certain diseases. Aside from the fact that this is the same administration that could not get a website to work properly that was associated with their signature legislation- Obamacare, this method of screening proposed by Loretta Lynch is even less useless as the TSA, also under their control, has proven to be in stopping terrorists.
The database that Loretta Lynch has been telling people that the intelligence community will be comparing incoming refugees against is actually not in existence in Syria. The country is in the middle of a war between several factions, and so we have no data to access.
This is unlike the database that we had in Iraq when we were taking in Iraqi refugees. We had had a presence there for almost a decade and were able to do our own research on the people there and make informed decisions about who to bring in and who not to.
Without a reliable intelligence on the ground in Syria, it makes the Obama Administration’s screening efforts as useful as a box of broken white crayons. They cannot protect against someone bent on violence or supporting a militant cause.
Barack Obama’s plan to blindly bring in 10,000 Syrian refugees is a plan that, unfortunately, will be paid for with the blood of innocent civilians on American soil.